What the Internet is really about

A couple of weeks ago I said that I thought that I knew what the Internet was all about.

I was wrong.

The Internet is about sharing information, without censorship, or control, from government, police, any official, religious or political leader. It is up to you to decide what is the truth. Don’t get all your information from one source, that is tightly controlled (i.e. TV). Gather your news like they are precious nuggets of gold.

The reason I bring this up is this documentary:

It is a long documentary, but worthwhile the information. If nothing else, it will wake up the gray cells in your head!

Kunt u mij de weg naar Hamelen vertellen, meneer?

Now, this is what the Internet is all about in my opinion.

This is a Dutch children TV show, from the early 1970′s if I remember correctly, about what happened to the children of the village of Hamelen, or Hamelin as you English speakers might know it, when the Pied Piper (or “Rattenvanger”) frees the town of rats, but keeps the children hostage until the village pays him.

Popular believe has it that only 6 episodes survived on tape. However, someone only known as ogterop-deux (after one of the characters the kids encounter) is trying to get other episodes online. Check out this compilation of the first season, and follow the links to see other episodes.

A warning however: since this show is Dutch, it is spoken in Dutch, so only of interest to people who actually speak Dutch… :-)

Bear traps, time burglars and attention sinks

I just finished watching a recording of Merlin Mann’s presentation Bear traps, time burglars and attention sinks, or “Why does my email make me crazy?”. He discusses the problems today’s Knowledge Worker faces, and gives a couple of quick tips on how to get a handle on them.

You can watch the recording at iTunes. Also, visit Merlin’s website 43folders for more information and tips on Getting Things Done.

Revision3 suffered Denial of Service attack from… MediaDefender?

Revision3, host of such video podcasts as Diggnation, Systm and TekZilla, suffered a Denial of Service attack over the Memorial Day weekend. The interesting twist in this is that Revision3 says MediaDefender was the one causing the DoS attack.

Why is this interesting? Because for years discussions have been going on about the moral and legal issues of remotely trying to patch a machine that is part of a zombie network. The strategy is using a similar technique as the controllers of the network use to tell their zombies what to do, but in this case it tells the zombies to patch themselves and “revive” them from zombiness. The main point of discussion is whether or not it is morally and legally correct to control someone else’s machine, even if the purpose of that control is to fix a problem.

And here is MediaDefender doing that exact thing, with the disastrous end result that prevents anti-virus companies from employing the remote patch strategy. According to Jim Louderback’s blog post (CEO of Revision3), MediaDefender readily admits to using Revision3 servers for what they believe a good cause (distributing fake torrents to identify and neutralize illegal file sharing websites). The problem is, they never informed Revision3, who noticed the unknown torrents, identified them, and blocked access to them. At that point, the MediaDefender servers went postal, believing that some distributor had blocked them, and started a SYN flood on the Revision3 servers.

When Revision3 traced all this back to MediaDefender, there was no apology or anything. Just a statement saying that they now added a policy to prevent this from happening again. Which is perfectly fine, but what about the thought behind the original policy? What if this DoS was targeted against something more critical than Revision3′s video distribution (not belittling Revision3), like a hospital, power plant or EMS station?

I hope Revision3 follows up on this. Apparently the FBI is involved (a DoS attack is illegal), and hopefully this will result in something more than a slap on the hand.

Update: Wired has blogged about this as well.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Apple iTunes to raise prices on movies

According to MacNN, Apple is set to raise the prices on downloadable movies in iTunes to $15, just a couple of dollars below the retail price of a physical DVD. This means that for $3 more, you can order the same movie, without DRM, with extra content, in a nice box, and probably in better quality.

It is suggested in the article that the studios are under pressure from retailers such as Wal-Mart. Which basically means that old-style retail is trying to hold on to their distribution model, and forces the new-style retail to mimic their inefficiencies… I hope Apple will come up with something else, especially now that there are serious indications on the music side that the old model is failing (EMI scaling back funding of the RIAA, more and more DRM-free music).